Fred Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:00:25PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Joachim Backes wrote:
>
> > I'd say, UnitedRpms is a (better, more actual) replacement for
> > rpmfusion.
>
> What does "more actual" mean?
> Is it more likely to be compatible with CentOS and EPEL?
well, I don't know what the OP means, exactly, but as of the last
time I looked, rpmfusion did NOT have an EL7 repository, so if this
UnitedRpms does, maybe it is "actual" instead of "virtual".
Sorry, thought I was in the CentOS newsgroup ...
I should have said, "Is it more likely to be compatible with Fedora".
--
Timothy Murphy
gayleard /at/
eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin