How to take it out?
by Ferrero Horacio
How to take out to selinux so I cannot instal neither ntfs nor the
kernel.
Thaks for your help
Horacio
18 years, 7 months
OO.o & jre
by G Rajesh
Thank you, Paul. I will try it.
One of the aims of my posting is that RH/FC developers has to take note of it,
if it is their mistake. If it is mine, I wanted to get corrected.
One thing I miss is implementation of delta-rpms in FC - if it is available by
FC5, we are saved. Because, if this bug (say) is corrected, we have to
download another 95MBs, hmm! This will be a problem where there is a
limitation on data transfer my ISPs - though I have ADSL connection.
Regards,
Rajesh
18 years, 7 months
syslog traffic analyzers
by Justin Zygmont
I was wondering if anyone had any recommendations for a traffic analyzer
that will read from a syslog file, and not just by binding to the network
interface in promiscious mode. I was hoping to find a program that will
show traffic usage by IP address, many of them just show the total
traffic statistics.
18 years, 7 months
Re: big Problem with FC 4 and SATA (hdparm error)
by spmirowski
Hi,
i use a SATA Harddisk (Seagate 120GB) with Fedora Core 4.
Everything in the System is up to date (yum).
When i do this: hdparm -tT /dev/sda
I get the following error:
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 1944 MB in 2.00 seconds = 971.94 MB/sec
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate
ioctl
for device
Timing buffered disk reads: 170 MB in 3.01 seconds = 56.51 MB/sec
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate
ioctl
for device
Its not very fast and the error message is not so good i think.
What can i do to solve the Problem?
I also tried FC 4 on different Mainboards with different SATA
Harddisk. Same
error every time.
On FC3 with SATA there are no Problems! Downgrading is not possible.
I hope someone can help me?!
Thank you very much!
regards
Sebastian
I first found this bug around kernel 2.6.6 or so. I believe
it didn't go away until 2.6.13 for me. With the bug, my buffer
disk reads went down 10 MB or so. I never actually noticed
any difference in speed, it might have been just a bad benchmark.
Advice I received was never use hdparm for testing if you want
quality results. I don't really know much more about the topic.
Stephen
18 years, 7 months
Printer for FC4
by Michael Comperchio
I'm looking for a printer for my FC4. The only thing left that I can't
do is print. I've got a Brother MFC 3100c that I haven't been able to
find a printer driver for, so I guess I'm gonna have to replace it.
That's ok. I want to be rid of the XP install that's sitting on my
machine, so I'm quite willing to part with some hard earned money to do
it!...but I am Scottish (not cheap, frugal) so don't want to part with
too much of that hard earned money. Any Suggestions?
Thanks
Michael
18 years, 7 months
RE: Apache Httpd on FC4 screwed up? FrontPage will not work w/ochanges.
by Dan Thurman
>From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
>[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 5:38 PM
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases
>Subject: Re: Apache Httpd on FC4 screwed up? FrontPage will not work
>w/ochanges.
>
>
>Am Do, den 03.11.2005 schrieb Daniel B. Thurman um 1:16:
>
>> More information: The /etc/init.d/httpd script was replaced
>> with that from the FC2 and it all now works right. Something
>> major is going on with the latest updates and is preventing
>> FrontPage from being installed so I wonder what the deal is.
>>
>> Dan
>
>You are breaking your system! It would have been much better to be
>SElinux aware and have read about it. For instance if you run
>
>apachctl -v | cat
>
>with the apachectl script that ships with FC4 you will get the output
>you desires.
>
Ok, so my "problems" started because I had SElinux running and somehow
I do not have it properly configured so that the apachectl/htppd scripts
would work correctly, is that it?
I tested this theory out by restoring the original scripts and adding
selinux=0 to grub, rebooted, and everything worked like a charm.
Ok, so if I wanted to restore SElinux capability so that httpd would
properly start up, what is it that I need to do, or if you want me to
RTFM, can you provide me a starting place? What I noticed was that
under SElinux, the httpd failed to run because of something regarding
port 8090 for which FrontPage uses as a Virtual Server in that the httpd
daemon did not have the permissions to create this port/socket and so
httpd daemon failed to start.
Until I can figure this out, I will have my box running w/o SElinux.
Thanks for pointing this out.
>Alexander
>
>
>--
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.7/155 - Release Date: 11/1/2005
18 years, 7 months
RE: Apache Httpd on FC4 screwed up? FrontPage will not work w/o changes.
by Dan Thurman
>From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
>[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Daniel B. Thurman
>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:06 PM
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases (E-mail)
>Subject: Apache Httpd on FC4 screwed up? FrontPage will not work w/o
>changes.
>
>
>
>I finally did get my FrontPage extensions installed
>but not without being forced to change the apachectl
>file (to a previous version). The apachectl file from the
>CD *might* work but I haven't tested that one... I am
>using one from FC2!!!
>
>Using the apachectl from FC2 works for start, stop,
>restart, and it reports the flags such as -v from which
>FrontPage depends on, but the problem is that
>/etc/initd.d/httpd will not work on (re)boot so perhaps
>httpd script also needs to be reworked.
>
>The point is, that the updates after a fresh install FC4
>is somehow the culprit IMHO.
>
>For now, I am using the apachectl from FC2 and changed
>the /etc/initd.d/httpd script so that it will work for reboots.
>
>Can someone shed some light on this please?
>
>Kind regards,
>Dan
>
>--
More information: The /etc/init.d/httpd script was replaced
with that from the FC2 and it all now works right. Something
major is going on with the latest updates and is preventing
FrontPage from being installed so I wonder what the deal is.
Dan
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.7/155 - Release Date: 11/1/2005
18 years, 7 months