On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen
<bob(a)fedoraunity.org> wrote:
----- "Thomas Janssen" <thomasj(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Clive Hills <discordianuk(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Sadly, very sadly
> > I would like to see the following items on next week's agenda:
> >
> > Why can non-#fedora ops nominate #fedora ops
>
> That's indeed one interesting question. IIRC we had a consensus once
> that #ffedora ops can only be nominated and voted by #fedora ops. But
> i have to read a ton of backlogs to find it. Currently not the time
> for it.
>
> If i/we can't find the right log, i propose to have *at least* one
> fully qualified #fedora operator to nominate an long term helper
> who's
> exemplary (well, you know what "we" want), for probationary ops.
>
If this be the case should we also remove ops from all #fedora ops for the #fedora-social
channel until they are approved to be an op for that channel? Again I
point out that this issue is only being brought up to punish Sonar_Gal and gwerra for me
speaking my mind. This alone is bullshit. If you don't want ME to speak > or
nominate people don't punish them for it. This entire matter is getting way the hell
out of hand.
That is really nice *how* you play your games with us. Do you really
think i'm stupid just because my english isn't as good as yours? Or is
there a different reason? The only reason that topic came up was
*your* nomination of opsec.
You should speak up, as that's your right, but you should stop playing
games with us. And what you for sure should stop immediately, is to
involve two people i really like. Sonar_Gal (sorry that he brought you
in his dirty game) and gwerra have nothing to do with it!
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium