-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/2012 10:06 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:06:05 -0800 warren warren@fedoraos.org wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/2012 09:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:33:08 -0800 warren warren@fedoraos.org wrote:
why should anyone need to propose it?
Because it's a subjective decision... ?
no one should need to propose anything if "$predefined_time_period" for inactivity is defined.
My point is that defining such is difficult and unneeded when people who feel strongly about inactive people can simply propose them for removal when they feel they are inactive. If others agree, they can vote for it.
This avoids people 'gaming the system' by staying just active enough to be able to continue to vote.
kevin
My point is that "ops" should come with a pre-defined expiry date. It shouldn't be "well, you're good enough to get voted in once, now we need to vote and go through some lengthy process to remove you or make you behave" i.e. secret FUDCON meeting/letter to Bob.
This would curtail the "gaming the system" greatly, although not completely avoid it. Anyone intent on corruption could do so by simply registering another nick/account and being re-proposed/accepted. Anyone in a position of power in any organization ultimately has the ability and opportunity to take advantage and "drive" it.
irc-support-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org