On 11.12.2007 01:33, Michael Stahnke wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 2:19 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:11:53 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> wrote:
>
>> Personally, my vote is to always add the updates in.
+1 -- that actually was the plan, but it got forgotten afaics as we iirc
had no way to get the updates easily when we started EPEL. Does reposync
provide a solution these days for RHEL5?
>> It's easier to tell people that they must have an updated
system in
>> order to use EPEL packages.
>> Any other thoughts?
> I agree with Kevin. The latest updates should be made available in the
> buildroot. The /only/ time where this might not be done is at a point
> release date, where a /lot/ of updates will be released. Depending on
> how EPEL works with CentOS, there might be a delay at this point.
That's probably reasonable and sane.
+1
It would be nice if we could put
together some sort of schedule like when our builders get updates
after a RHEL (or I guess CentOS actually) update. Is it 2 weeks? Is
it whenever we get to it?
Soon after the CentOS updates ships?
CU
knurd