On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 11:25:46AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Axel Thimm schrieb:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:49:26PM -0600, Bernard Johnson wrote:
>> Axel Thimm wrote:
>
> Gosh, contrary to my vanishing sanity I succumb, and I fed the votings
> with some notes, I even did some research with my FPC hat on on what
> the best implementation would be and added that as a note, too. Which
> since it was just *my* FPC hat is just a suggestion about how the FPC
> may attack this, it is neither part of the EPEL voting, nor a
> guarantee that the FPC will do so. There may be even smarter and
> better implementations.
The critique I issued multiple times somewhere else in this thread still
is the same: I don't want to give a binding vote on a "Should EPEL carry
a repotag? If yes, the technical details will be delegated to the
Packaging Committee." question at this point of time. I want to see what
burden a repotag might create for packagers before I'll feel safe to
bless repotags. So I would vote "no" to currently; but I would vote
"yes" to a question "Should we further investigate the use of a repotag
and the technical details how to realize them", as long as someone is
willing to do the investigating work.
Since you already brought that up and I already answered to that, and
now it's a rehash of the rehash, I'm just going to quote.
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:04:49AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:19:29AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> I don't care what they decide, but in this case I think it's
> [FPC's] business [...]
>
> People [of the EPEL committee] that vote should know what they
> vote about to make the decision, and that's not the case here
> afaics.
You need to decide, do you make it FPC's call or not? You can't have
it both ways, e.g. put the FPC through making a decision and then
turning it down.
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:02:40PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
Aka postpone, work w/o a repotag and later noone wants to touch it
again. Aka effectivly vote against it, but pretend we care. Why
didn't you "investigate" when it was discussed? Everyone else
including the FPC did.
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net