On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:35:09AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 11:30 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > With a package you have a lot more garbage to maintain - with just
> > adding the dep you can phase it out in an update and not have to add any
> > obsoletes or conflicts garbage.
> >
> This argument could be used for every compat package in Fedora as well,
> though. Why don't we ship the openssl compat package and the main openssl
> packages from a single srpm?
B/c the openssl items are not on a horizon that is as a short as
6months.
I don't understand this phrasing. Could you restate?
This problem goes away when samba3x gets fixed.
Yes, in RHEL-5.6 IIUC and it goes as planned.
-Toshio