On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:31:42 -0400
Trey Dockendorf <treydock(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:25 AM Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz>
wrote:
> Hi Trey,
>
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:15:08 -0000
> treydock(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
> > It appears like RHEL8 dropped conman RPMs but they do exist in Fedora
> and appear to be receiving updates. I found a wiki page that said to
> contact the maintainers via email but I was unable to find the emails
> associated with the maintainers so I opened a bugzilla but wasn't sure if I
> did this bugzilla in appropriate place:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947480
> >
> > I'd be happy to become the maintainer of conman for EPEL8 if that would
> help get conman RPMs into EPEL8. Any pointers on how to go about getting
> conman into EPEL8 would be appreciated, in case the current approach I took
> is incorrect.
>
> sorry for not replying earlier, but if you are willing to maintain
> conman in EPEL, then the process should be fast. Are you already a
> packager in Fedora?
>
>
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
>
I have Fedora accounts that I setup many years ago and honestly don't
recall if I was ever setup to be a packager for Fedora. If there is a way
to verify if I am setup as a packager I'd be happy to check, but most
likely I am not a packager in Fedora.
that's a problem we can fix :-) New maintainers are always welcome.
Dan