On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:57 PM, <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> wrote:
>> Is anyone else surprised about this move? It appears to have broken IDL
>> on 5.2.
> Not really. Red Hat (CentOS's upstream) announced early on in the 5.x
> series that they would move to firefox 3.0 when it was ready. The Red
> Hat 5.2 beta had firefox-3.0 in it, and it had been discussed on this
> list before.
Well, not so much surprised by the appearance as surprised by the decision
to make a change that was likely to cause incompatibilities with software
built against 1.5. I moved to EL versions to try to avoid such things...
I think this was the reason for the Red Hat 5.x.y releases. There were
paying customers who wanted a new desktop and others who wanted an old
one. Red Hat 5.1.x will be locked with firefox-1.5 etc, but the
various users that want 3.0 with 5 will get it with 5.2,5.3 series.
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"