On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:16:58PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This would be a totally seperate 'epel-bleeding' or
'epel-newer-versions' repo?
If we did this, we would be best served with an entirely new
brand/name.
Aside from the challenges of Eh-pull/Ee-pull and acronyms in general,
there is also a brand expectation around EPEL.
EPEL is the stable, stolid, same-old-you-can-rely-upon moving at the
pace of RHEL itself.
An exciting, new, updated parallel/conflicting package set should have
a new name and identity.
- Karsten
--
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41