Bill Nottingham wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen (smooge(a)gmail.com) said:
> I don't think we have one. We have dealt with the older policy where
> things conflicted with 5.1 but not 5.0.
>
> What exactly are the packages having problems?
gtkhtml3 was rebased in 5.2, changing ABI. We can ship (in EPEL)
a gtkhtml38 package, but it will conflict at the file level with
gtkhtml3 from 5.1 and earlier.
Bill
I suppose there was a very good reason for the base change, but I
thought things like this are one of the issues using RHEL was suppose to
avoid.