On Dec 10, 2007 2:19 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:11:53 -0700
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> wrote:
> Personally, my vote is to always add the updates in.
> It's easier to tell people that they must have an updated system in
> order to use EPEL packages.
>
> Any other thoughts?
I agree with Kevin. The latest updates should be made available in the
buildroot. The /only/ time where this might not be done is at a point
release date, where a /lot/ of updates will be released. Depending on
how EPEL works with CentOS, there might be a delay at this point.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
That's probably reasonable and sane. It would be nice if we could put
together some sort of schedule like when our builders get updates
after a RHEL (or I guess CentOS actually) update. Is it 2 weeks? Is
it whenever we get to it?
stahnma