On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 5:54 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
After the announcement today of centos-stream, I wonder if it would make
sense to move epel8-playground to build against that instead of the
latest rhel8 release?
It would make playground less usefull for testing new radical changes
against the current stable point release, but on the other hand, the
centos stream will become the next stable point release, so it would
allow people to test against that and get changes ready that they could
then push in after the next stable point release landed?
What do folks think? Bad idea, good idea?
If we do that, then we should rename `epel8-playground` to `epel8-stream`...
I'd like it to work the same way that epel7 worked. And that means no
more automatic provisioning epel8-playground for epel8 stuff. And
package.cfg should become optional.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!