-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/22/2015 12:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>>> Also, this would probibly be some kind of big deal to
some
>>>> people who like that EPEL is built against rhel.
>>>> Personally, I don't think it matters, but it would have to
>>>> be communicated clearly.
>>
>> (I also saw Karsten reply about it) It needs to be
>> communicated, but considering CentOS good history on that
>> matter, I personally don't think it's big deal, too.
It is a much bigger deal politically than technically
I agree it's a big deal, but think it's more about 'supportability',
which is the crossroads for technical, end-user needs, business
dynamics, community capability, and so forth.
I personally *like* that Red Hat support has comfort level with
pointing customers at EPEL; I don't want that to change. To me that is
a core promise from the community to our end-users, wherever they are
from.
- - Karsten
- --
Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \
http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlYCDJwACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEH2QQCg1cBadVBZYMjuAorV0xzjB8gj
mIYAn1yiflU1kFwJG1pVOnp3ryuqgMM7
=Ds5V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----