Hi,
I do see that hwloc 1.4 in EPEL6 can cause a lot of trouble given the
fact that hwloc 1.1 is now available in RHEL6 (when I was creating
hwloc package it was not in RHEL6 and in fact I was the major advocate
to include it in RHEL6). I will revoke the request.
I'm not sure about EPEL5 - hwloc 1.1 is now very old compared with
hwloc 1.4 Should I revoke the request as well?
Thanks
Jirka
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> wrote:
hwloc 1.4 has been submitted as an update to EPEL5 and 6:
<
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-0500/hwloc-1.4-1...
<
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-0501/hwloc-1.4-1...
There are two problems with this:
- hwloc 1.1 is now in RHEL6:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/hwloc-1....
- hwloc 1.1 has a soname of libhwloc.so.1, 1.4 has libhwloc.so.4, although
nothing in RHEL5/6 or EPEL5/6 appears to depend on it.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com