On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 07:39:51PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There isn't any guideline either way. I usually prefer to use
patches
myself, but this spec is based on one from Dag, and he used the perl
substitutions in there, so I left it in order to keep close to his spec.
So EPEL clamav is going to look like Dag's, not like the "regular"
Fedora clamav?
I'm not really a fan of the Fedora clamav packages, but I do have to
live with them (for amavisd-new). How much pain is this fork going to
cause me?
Honestly, I think I'd rather volunteer to maintain Enrico's clamav spec
in EPEL than even think about maintaining forked amavisd-new specs.
Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve(a)kspei.com
http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320