On 17.07.2007 14:52, Joel Andres Granados wrote:
Joel Andres Granados wrote:
> Regarding the python-imaging package...
> What is the matter with including the 1.1.6 version in EPEL/el5? does
> it break anything?
> Both Plone and python-docutils (deps in EPEL) use the Image library
> from PIL and this library does not have any
> backward compatibility issues. additionally, RHEL5-client has no
> package that depends on
> python-imaging. So I say KISS, and ship 1.1.6 with the EPEL/el5. I
> know it goes against the EPEL policies,
> but I think its much better that messing with nvr.
And what about EPEL/e4, the EPEL wiki says to use code form fedora core
3.
That the advice, yes.
[...]
Moreover, is there an additional way to build EPEL packages.
I'm following
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo
wiki for the builds. Is this correct?
The old Extras procedure applies; e.g. update cvs, run "make tag build";
koji and bodi, which are used for F-7 and rawhide are not yet used for EPEL.
CU
thl