Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> said:
Does this mean if there's a package foo that is a rhel package,
in a module, that it can be overlapped with a foo package thats in a
epel non default module? ie, does it only mean the modular case or does
it mean any rpm?
As a consumer of EPEL, I'd rather nothing in the base RHEL (or really
CentOS in my case) ever get replaced, up or downgrade, by something in
Unless... does RHEL have modules that replace base packages? I admit, I
haven't fully got my head wrapped around all the effects of modularity.
Chris Adams <linux(a)cmadams.net>