On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:26:18 -0700
Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think it has a nugget to work on so I am not against this..
What goes into stable? I can see slipstream getting all the packages
because its easier to break things.. but I don't see much reason to
put stuff into stable.
Well, we would need to be strict I think for what can go into the
slipstream repo, and also it should be disabled by default in
epel-release, so only those that enable it would see those packages.
I would think maintainers would like to have their packages in
testing/stable to reach the widest audience, and only use slipstream if
there was no other choice.
I agree it would be more work to have another repo, possibly more than
we have people to work on at this point, but I think thats the best
solution if we can pull it off.
kevin