On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 06:40 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 31.07.2007 22:19, Karsten Wade wrote:
>> Is this inaccurate/old?
> It's IMHO accurate, but they wording maybe could be improved.
D'oh! That wasn't what I meant to point to, but it looks like you
removed the part that confused me. You did remove it, right? The
changelog says, "move a part to the faq that belongs there". But this
content is old, right? I see you didn't put it into the FAQ.
It is there in the FAQ now. Check again.