On 09/05/2014 12:49 AM, Karsten Wade wrote:
For anything related to the new repo, this is an important part of
the
idea. We want to set a new expectation with the new brand. Maybe we
can just tie it to the upstream-of-Fedora -- 13 months, rolls with
each Fedora release, etc.?
It would look saner to me to tie it to the minor
release cycle of
RHEL. Fedora is in now way involved here ( short of being the source of
the packages ).
BUT as we want to decouple the repos ( i.e. base+updates from the
rest of the ecosystem ) and allow a shorter cycle for 3rd parties, I
would not tie anything to the cycle of RHEL either. We need to allow
individual SIGs to be able to push $STUFF in their own cycle
My .02 eurocents ( add 30% for US currency )
manuel