On Mar 19, 2013 12:13 PM, "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 19.03.2013 18:40, schrieb Richard Vickery:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net<mailto:
h.reindl(a)thelounge.net>> wrote:
>
> Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
> >>>> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines
actually say
> >>>> that anywhere?
> >>>
> >>> but WHY are they not saying it clearly?
> >
> > Yes, they are saying it very clearly (see [1])
>
> ok, so anything which refers to /bin and /sbin is a bug
> after the UsrMove exactly as i felt
>
> wow, there are lot of bugs over the distribution
>
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout
> In addition, Fedora packages MUST NOT place files or directories in
the
/bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64 directories.
> Instead, the /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/lib, and /usr/lib64
directories must be used. Packages must assume that
> /bin, /sbin, /lib, and /lib64 are symbolic links to the
/usr/bin,
/usr/sbin, /usr/lib, and /usr/lib64 directories,
> respectively
>
> This might be unrelated, but the latest conversations, this on in
particular,
make me wonder: Did I miss a
> preupgrade, or is the above inquiry still focused around F18
bugs?
it is independent of F18/F19/Rawhide
i had all sorts of troubles in my daily usage of F17/F18
resulting in the unfinsihed UsrMove and that one packager
does not know what the other does because some does not
care about changes in the distribution at all
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Thanks.