On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net
<mailto:h.reindl@thelounge.net>> wrote:
Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
>>>> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
>>>>
>>>> That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines
actually say
>>>> that anywhere?
>>>
>>> but WHY are they not saying it clearly?
>
> Yes, they are saying it very clearly (see [1])
ok, so anything which refers to /bin and /sbin is a bug
after the UsrMove exactly as i felt
wow, there are lot of bugs over the distribution
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout
In addition, Fedora packages MUST NOT place files or directories in the /bin, /sbin,
/lib or /lib64 directories.
Instead, the /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/lib, and /usr/lib64 directories must be used.
Packages must assume that
/bin, /sbin, /lib, and /lib64 are symbolic links to the /usr/bin, /usr/sbin,
/usr/lib, and /usr/lib64 directories,
respectively
This might be unrelated, but the latest conversations, this on in particular, make me
wonder: Did I miss a
preupgrade, or is the above inquiry still focused around F18 bugs?
it is independent of F18/F19/Rawhide
i had all sorts of troubles in my daily usage of F17/F18
resulting in the unfinsihed UsrMove and that one packager
does not know what the other does because some does not
care about changes in the distribution at all