Am 17.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
>> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
>>
>>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
>>
>> That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say that
>> anywhere?
>
> but WHY are they not saying it clearly?
> until now UsrMove is a half-baken thing
No, with UsrMove you have symbol links
ll /
bin -> usr/bin
lib -> usr/lib
lib64 -> usr/lib64
sbin -> usr/sbin
I'm not sure, but I'd say, you must have the symbol links
and hwat does this change on the fact that the real location
is /usr/sbin/service and /usr/bin/bash
> see below - what the hell, /usr/bin/bash is a valid shell
>
> [root@fileserver:~]$ system-config-users
> The value for the SHELL variable was not found the /etc/shells file
> This incident has been reported
>
> [root@fileserver:~]$ cat /etc/shells
> /bin/sh
> /bin/bash
> /sbin/nologin
>
> [root@fileserver:~]$ cat /etc/passwd | grep root
> root:x:0:0:root:/root:/usr/bin/bash
and if both are valid both have to be valid as shell
in ANY context or anything changed to the physical location