Starting udev: udevd[609]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev
version, please use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or ATTRS{}= to
match a parent device, in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-euvccam.rules:1
udevd[609]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version, please
use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or ATTRS{}= to match a parent
device, in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-euvccam.rules:2
udevd[609]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version, please
use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or ATTRS{}= to match a parent
device, in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-euvccam.rules:3
udevd[609]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version, please
use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or ATTRS{}= to match a parent
device, in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-euvccam.rules:4
udevd[609]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version, please
use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or ATTRS{}= to match a parent
device, in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-euvccam.rules:5
udevd[609]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version, please
use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or ATTRS{}= to match a parent
device, in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-euvccam.rules:6
udevd[609]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version, please
use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or ATTRS{}= to match a parent
device, in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-euvccam.rules:7
Will this cause problems in the future? I noticed it immediately after
updating the kernel.
Show replies by date
On -10/01/37 11:59, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:03:13 -0700
Silent-Hunter wrote:
> Will this cause problems in the future? I noticed it immediately after
> updating the kernel.
It wasn't the kernel update, but the libunicap update that
caused it (they happened to show up at the same time):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643729
Oh.
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:03:13 -0700
Silent-Hunter wrote:
Will this cause problems in the future? I noticed it immediately
after
updating the kernel.
It wasn't the kernel update, but the libunicap update that
caused it (they happened to show up at the same time):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643729