On 21 Jan 2011, at 23:31, Joe Zeff <joe(a)zeff.us> wrote:
IMO, an unsecured computer on the net is just as much of an
attractive
nuisance as a swimming pool that's not properly fenced in and the owner
is just as liable for any damage.
Your analogy is flawed, as pools are not generally able to conduct remote attacks
once compromised. That's why unsecured computers are bad.
On a complete side note, perhaps those worried about unfenced pools should consider
keeping a closer eye on the things dear to them that might fall in.
Alan