On 20 Sep 2023 at 19:57, Zdenek Pytela wrote:
From: Zdenek Pytela zpytela@redhat.com Date sent: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:57:31 +0200 Subject: Re: Noticed Failed message with selinux-policy-targeted on 3 of 5 machines?? To: mikes@guam.net, Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 8:25 AM Michael D. Setzer II via users users@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: In running dnf update on 5 machines noticed a fail message on 3 or 5? To double check ran dnf reinstall selinux* and get this on failing systems?
Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Running scriptlet: selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/1 Running scriptlet: selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/1 Preparing : 1/1 Reinstalling : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8 Reinstalling : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8 Reinstalling : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8 Failed to resolve allow statement at /var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/200/container/cil:1186 Failed to resolve AST /usr/sbin/semodule: Failed!
Reinstalling : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8 Cleanup : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 5/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8 Cleanup : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8 Cleanup : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8 Cleanup : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 5/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
Reinstalled: selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
Complete!
Other day get a message about about regex version not matching, and was told to reintall container-selinux. That doesn't seem to fix issue. Did find changing to minimum option gets rid of the regex message? But why 2 of the machines seem to have no problem, but other 3 get same message? Michael,
The update restults may depend on other components or if some customizations are in place. What version is container-selinux?
rpm -qa "selinux-policy*" "*-selinux"
rpm -qa | grep selinux-policy selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-doc-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
Noticed one machine that gets failed didn't have selinux-policy-doc installed and installed it, then tried reinstalling all the selinux-policy and still got error? Failed to resolve allow statement at /var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/200/container/cil:1186 Failed to resolve AST /usr/sbin/semodule: Failed! Files in that directory are -rw-------. 1 root root 2 Sep 21 08:09 lang_ext -rw-------. 1 root root 24411 Sep 21 08:09 hll -rw-------. 1 root root 13487 Sep 21 08:09 cil
The cil file is a binary file, so not sure what :1186 means? that tmp directory doesn't exist on my notebook that doesn't have error? set selinux to minimal on machines.
I cannot reproduce your problem using any updating path with the latest package versions.
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.or g Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Zdenek Pytela Security SELinux team
+------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) mailto:mikes@guam.net mailto:msetzerii@gmail.com Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ +------------------------------------------------------------+