On 20 Sep 2023 at 19:57, Zdenek Pytela wrote:
From: Zdenek Pytela <zpytela(a)redhat.com>
Date sent: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:57:31 +0200
Subject: Re: Noticed Failed message with selinux-policy-targeted on 3 of 5 machines??
To: mikes(a)guam.net,
Community support for Fedora users <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 8:25 AM Michael D. Setzer II via users
<users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
In running dnf update on 5 machines noticed a fail message on 3 or 5?
To double check ran dnf reinstall selinux* and get this on failing
systems?
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
Running scriptlet:
selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/1
Running scriptlet:
selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/1
Preparing : 1/1
Reinstalling : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8
Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8
Running scriptlet :
selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8
Reinstalling :
selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8
Running scriptlet :
selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8
Running scriptlet :
selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8
Reinstalling : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8
Running scriptlet :
selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8
Failed to resolve allow statement at
/var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/200/container/cil:1186
Failed to resolve AST
/usr/sbin/semodule: Failed!
Reinstalling : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8
Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8
Cleanup : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 5/8
Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8
Cleanup : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8
Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8
Cleanup : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8
Running scriptlet :
selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8
Cleanup : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
Running scriptlet :
selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
Running scriptlet :
selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
Running scriptlet :
selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
Verifying : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8
Verifying : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8
Verifying : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8
Verifying : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8
Verifying : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 5/8
Verifying : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8
Verifying : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8
Verifying : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
Reinstalled:
selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
Complete!
Other day get a message about about regex version not matching, and
was told to
reintall container-selinux. That doesn't seem to fix issue.
Did find changing to minimum option gets rid of the regex message?
But why 2 of the machines seem to have no problem, but other 3 get
same message?
Michael,
The update restults may depend on other components or if some
customizations are in place. What version is container-selinux?
rpm -qa "selinux-policy*" "*-selinux"
rpm -qa | grep selinux-policy
selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-doc-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
Noticed one machine that gets failed didn't have selinux-policy-doc
installed and installed it, then tried reinstalling all the
selinux-policy and still got error?
Failed to resolve allow statement at
/var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/200/container/cil:1186
Failed to resolve AST
/usr/sbin/semodule: Failed!
Files in that directory are
-rw-------. 1 root root 2 Sep 21 08:09 lang_ext
-rw-------. 1 root root 24411 Sep 21 08:09 hll
-rw-------. 1 root root 13487 Sep 21 08:09 cil
The cil file is a binary file, so not sure what :1186 means?
that tmp directory doesn't exist on my notebook that doesn't have
error?
set selinux to minimal on machines.
I cannot reproduce your problem using any updating path with the
latest
package versions.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.or
g
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Zdenek Pytela
Security SELinux team
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired)
mailto:mikes@guam.net
mailto:msetzerii@gmail.com
Guam - Where America's Day Begins
G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer
http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+------------------------------------------------------------+