On 12/25/2015 10:00 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:50 PM, maderios <maderios(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> 'Secure boot' is just a windows problem. In Linux world, nobody uses
'Secure
> Boot'. In Windows world, they need it and they use it because Windows system
> is 'natively' insecured.
Nonsense. Secure Boot secures Linux systems against rootkits, as
well, by prohibiting unsigned content
Its' Redhat point of view...
I'm not specialist but, historically, I know Redhat dev asked Linus
Torvalds patch kernel with 'secure boot'
Linus Torvalds answer (2013):
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2029542/linus-torvalds-speaks-out-with-a-s...
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/02/linus-torvalds-i-wi...
http://www.networkworld.com/article/2224184/microsoft-subnet/microsoft-s-...
--
Maderios