On 07/19/2010 05:51 PM, David wrote:
On 7/19/2010 7:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700,
>> Michael Miles<mmamiga6(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to
>>> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion.
>>>
>> Fedora doesn't produce the kmod. You really should be asking about this on
>> the RPMfusion mailiing lists.
>>
> This is true, but to the extent that some people can't use the recent kernel
> until a working video driver is available, it is a Fedora issue. Updates which
> have security implications really shouldn't have to run in R/L 3 as text only. I
> don't need 3D accelerated anythings to run a few simple xterms and load
> monitoring, but not having X at all is an upgrade stopper. I'm running radeon,
> but more than a few systems which ran well on FC9 need to use VESA modes or even
> a laptop a VNC. The support for ATI and Nvidia hardware only a few years old is
> spotty at best.
>
> Good suggestion, though, he won't get any help here.
>
Obviously the previous kernel worked correct? Why not use that one?
I am using the previous kernel.
I just like to keep up and it is a update
I would like to know why the kmod is for a driver that does not exist.
195.36.31-2 is the driver and the kmod for this driver and new kernel
195.36.31-1 which ends with the wrong number
Even the kmod for the previous kernel is mismatched and ends with -1
instead of -2
Michael