Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> As an aside, cone is available from fedora extras, and is quite
nice.
> Not as featureful as pine though.
Such as?
Hi Sam - sorry, wasn't meaning to be critical of your excellent cone
MUA, which incidentally is what I currently use in preference to pine,
and I am extremely grateful for your efforts.
However, to answer your question, I haven't found a way to integrate
cone with an ldap directory, which is possible with pine. Not a big deal
though.
Jonathan.