Dear Fedora Experts,
after a little work-out and a big help from people in comp.text.te and
others on this group I solved the issue and wrote down a rpm spec for a
fake texlive rpm that fools the yum system.
Since I think this is can help someone else I'll attach to this message
the .spec file that you can use to recreate the fake rpm. To do this you
need the rpmdevtools installed and do the following:
1. rpmdev-setuptree (as a normal user)
to create the necessary ~/rpmbuild tree
2. rpmbuild -bb --clean texlive2010-fake.spec
to create the rpm file
3. yum install --nogpgcheck texlive2010-fake-1.0-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
to really install the rpm
From this point on you can install all the packages you need without
worrying about satisfying the tex dependencies.
I HTH
Walter
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Walter Cazzola wrote:
Dear Fedora Experts,
bored of the several problems of the texlive 2010 distribution for
fedora (see my previous message about the missed hyphenation and the
1-month old broken dependency on the latex binary) I have decides to
remove it and reinstall it through tlmgr.
That has been a great idea except for a couple of issues on some
*nonrelated" packages. To remove texlive yum forced the remotion of a2ps
and R-core (and few other but these are the most important for me) and I
can't reinstall them without reinstalling texlive (at least in part).
Now I've already installed texlive but not through yum and I'm wondering
why the rpm for these packages not really related to LaTeX and in
any case working also without LaTeX can't check for the bins instead of
the whole package.
Is there a way for forcing their installation without installing
texlive?
Thanks all for the help
Walter
--