On 06/30/15 19:31, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/29/2015 01:45 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
> [Sorry for the late answer, I was away from this machine.]
>
> 2015-06-28 1:01 GMT+02:00, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko(a)greshko.com>:
>> On 06/27/15 21:15, Andras Simon wrote:
>>> 2015-06-27 15:11 GMT+02:00, Andras Simon <szajmi(a)gmail.com>:
>>>> Should I be worried about the $subject?
>>> And there's also a "SELinux is preventing sh from execute access on
>>> the file /usr/sbin/ldconfig" which I've only just noticed. It
sounds
>>> even scarier.
>>>
>> Does your output match these?
>>
>> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ls -Z /bin/bash
>> system_u:object_r:shell_exec_t:s0 /bin/bash
>>
>> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ls -Z /usr/sbin/ldconfig
>> system_u:object_r:ldconfig_exec_t:s0 /usr/sbin/ldconfig
> Yes, I get the same result.
>
> Andras
Everything seems correct.
But the AVC's indicate that firewalld was attempting to runldconfig...
Which I believe should not happen normally. The transactions at the
time of yum/rpm indicate
that the transaction or at least the post install sections were being
run as firewalld_t.
Should that be BZ's to against firewalld?
--
Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora -
https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4