On Apr 5, 2005 11:15 PM, Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz(a)simpaticus.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 22:07 -0400, David Curry wrote:
> I thoroughly disagree with the notion that the decision to adopt
>
Fedoraforum.org as a vehicle was unilateral or done without consultation.
>
I don't. I agree with that. I would welcome some insight as to how you
feel that decision was bi- or multi-lateral, or how the *users* were
consulted.
Right. There was no consultation.
> There was a rather extensive discussion several weeks back of
the
> desirability of moving to a web interface for endusers. I found it an
> appalling idea at the time as list exchanges suggested to me that those
> subscribers possessing the technical skills to really help out endusers
> would be unlikely to populate the web interface subscriber group. I was
> also concerned by the general tone from many of the thread participants
> that endusers were really not welcome on fedora-list.
>
May I ask where this discussion was held? I read darn near all of this
mailing list, and I particularly care about threads like that one, and I
do not recall much support for webfora on this list at all.
The discussion was held here, on this list. See:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fedora-list&w=2&r=1&s=under+t...
However, the common sense there was that most people *did not* want to
move to web fora.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gustavo Seabra Graduate Student
Chemistry Dept. Kansas State University
Registered Linux user number 381680
------------------------------------------------------------------
If at first you don't succeed...
...skydiving is not for you.