On 11/11/2018 05:38 PM, home user via users wrote:
The xclock man page lists the "-strftime" option for
specifying digital date-time format, and says "This option allows an strftime(3)
format string to be specified for the digital clock's display.". So I would
think it would it would interpret the "%n" specifier as does strftime.
Apparently, my thinking is wrong. I thought xclock was calling strftime. Apparently not,
or maybe it does not know what to do with a part of what strftime returns.
Well, open a Bugzilla on it.