On 06/09/2014 02:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:59:15AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
>> till October) will give folks plenty of time to hone their dnf skills.
>> IMO, for many (majority?) it will be a drop-in replacement for yum.
> Yes, that's the plan. There are some differences but they are all well
> documented.
Is the plan to actually rename dnf to yum at that point?
1. Is there a yum compatibility test suite? It dnf is supposed to be a
drop-in replacement, not having one would seem grossly silly and should
be treated as "full stop show stopper".
2. If dnf is supposed to be a drop-in replacement, a more reasonable
approach but to force dnf upon all users by brute force, would be to
apply "alternatives".
If it is truly a
drop-in replacement, that seems like the less disruptive approach for users
(and scripts) everywhere.
Agreed. I regret, but so far, dnf I do not see much sense
in dnf.
Ralf