On 6/2/20 12:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 00:25:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64
>>
>> The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the
>> most common use case.
>
> Maybe you missed the original message where he tried the equivalent of
> that with dnf. There's something funny with the package name. I'm
> guessing that the version is part of the name for some reason.
Then whoever created that package needs to be told. ;-)
My understanding was that it was a package he made himself, so I think
he's been told.