Martin Marques wrote:
>> OK, that's not really true. Mark is a sharp guy, and gets
open source as
>> well, indeed, better, than most. But he's completely wrong on his
>> criticism of Red Hat (which Greg of the Fedora Project shoots down). His
>> basic point? Because RHEL is a closed binary, it's proprietary.
>>
>> Full article at,
>>
http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/ubuntu_founder....
>>
> Going through my Fedora folder, I came back across this one. I
have
> never understood the comment. How is RHEL a "closed binary"? I'm
having
> a time making sense of that statement. No biggie, just curious as heck.
If RHEL was closed, CentOS wouldn't exist. :-D
So I would say that Mark really doesn't know what he's talking about.
If RHEL wasn't closed, CentOS wouldn't need to exist. Please explain
why I need to know the difference.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell(a)gmail.com