Am 20.02.2013 00:52, schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 02/19/2013 10:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> data without a raid are useless
My point was that even RAID is next to useless because it doesn't protect you against
bit-rot.
it does
> and in case of
> RAID you have to have at least one full backup
> and so it does not care me if disks are dying
Depends how many versioned backups you have, I suppose. It is possible to not notice RAID
silenced bit-rot for a
long time, especially with a lot of data
what do you think why a weakly raid-check is running
per default and any high-grade RAID does srub?