On Sun, 2007-28-10 at 14:45 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote:
You didn't need to mention that I have a choice. I can change
to
Windows which due to it's cost includes what a person with my computer
needs to work. Fedora does not and plans if your accurate to make it
even harder for a user to use your free product.
Why "even harder"? The policy isn't changing. It's the same one that
Fedora has always used.
That sounds counter
productive to me.
That depends on whether you value software freedom or not. If you do,
then Fedora is doing exactly what it should be doing, and a few
inconveniences are an acceptable price to pay for maintaining your
political and philosophical opinion.
If you don't -- if all you want is an operating system that doesn't cost
you anything and operates as efficiently as possible -- then, yeah, I
suppose it must sound counter-productive. But, in that case, your
priorities are greatly out of line with Fedora's.
--
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7177
Burnaby, BC, Canada
web:
http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield
blog:
http://brucebyfield.wordpress.com/