On 06/16/14 04:42, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/16/14 16:37, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> > So there is still a considerable difference in what each of them does here,
I ran into this the other day. It would seem the way dnf handles caching is different
from yum. Not 100% sure/convinced this "fixed" my problem....but after running
"dnf clean expire-cache" it then reported the same thing as yum.
Yes, [root@box10 bobg]# dnf clean expire-cache
Yields the same update list this morning, only two items in this case.
But it seems to eat up any time saved by running dnf instead of yum.
Bob
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10 Fedora-20/64bit Linux/XFCE