On 7/19/2010 9:17 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
On 07/19/2010 05:51 PM, David wrote:
> On 7/19/2010 7:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>
> Obviously the previous kernel worked correct? Why not use that one?
>
>
>
I am using the previous kernel.
I just like to keep up and it is a update
I would like to know why the kmod is for a driver that does not exist.
195.36.31-2 is the driver and the kmod for this driver and new kernel
195.36.31-1 which ends with the wrong number
Even the kmod for the previous kernel is mismatched and ends with -1
instead of -2
You really should ask this on the RPMfusion list. It is their package after.
--
David