On 07/23/2010 03:20 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Marko
Vojinovic<vvmarko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Really, in order to provide equivalent functionality of a typical Windows
> desktop, Fedora requires more than one hoop to jump through. A novice user is
> maybe better off installing Omega instead, if he doesn't want to bother with
> this stuff.
>
You know, this thread is pointless. It's Parshwa saying "I don't know
anything!" over and over, g making things scarier than they are, and
folks like Marko here basically implying Fedora's a big PITA. None of
this is true. Parshwa's not stupid. He learned Windows in the first
place, he can learn Fedora just by bucking down and using it. And
Fedora's less of a PITA than Windows.
I can't believe I've run into a Fedora FUD thread on the Fedora users
list. I'm completely floored. You all have fun with it.
I have to differ.
The best thing that ever happened to my computer was Fedora.
It's double the speed of Windows 7, no registry is a big plus, no
defrag, no virus.
What more can you ask for.
So it's not as pretty, so what.
The security alone
And after all, where did windows come from..........Linux
Sure there is problems, such is life.
Not having Micropuke look at everything I do is a big plus
Windows 7 ultimate is 250 dollars????????????
That sucks, you pay money to be watched
Michael