On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 08:20 -0500, g wrote:
why would you want it to 'fail reliably'? :=)
It's a long standing problem with debugging, or electronics servicing,
that failing things will work properly while you try to diagnose the
bastards. You need something to consistently do something (work, or
not, but not both), to assess it.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.