I tend to use sha256sum to check file integrity and then as far into gpg
(see:
https://www.gnupg.org/ ) as is practical in the situation.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm(a)htt-consult.com>
wrote:
On 08/28/2014 04:47 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 15:29:58 -0400,
> Robert Moskowitz <rgm(a)htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Today you might STILL use sha1; it has had tremendous resiliency. NIST
>> was expecting it to fall as badly as md5 by this point. Most use at least
>> sha256, and sha3 is now out there. Choose your poison.
>>
>
> sha3 isn't really ready yet (unless something changed within the last
> couple of months). The algorithm was chosen a while ago, but there are
> parameters that need to be chosen and as yet there isn't a standard sha3.
>
> yeah. It is out there. Somewhere.
--
users mailing list
users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away:
http://ask.fedoraproject.org