On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:27 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:35:49 -0500,
"David G. Mackay" <mackay_d(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Shouldn't there have been some indication of problems prior to the
> failure?
Only if you are lucky. Someone at Google published some information about
smart around a year ago. In cases where catastrophic failures occur, for a high
percentage there is no warning from smart.
Thanks, I'll have to look that up. Suddenly the feeling that I'm
getting about smart isn't quite so warm and fuzzy.
Dave