On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:19:23PM +0200, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
If I've understood this thread then I'm guessing that these
RHEL clones
are more stable than fedora - [...]
Only more stable in the sense of less turnover -- Fedora Core itself is
quite stable in the sense of "not crashing". (RHEL4 is 90% identical to
Fedora Core 3.)
I'm pretty new to linux and have
been
disappointed with the complexity of setting things up to run smoothly
for a recent convert from windows.
Many things in Linux have a steep learning curve, but once you've mastered
the basics, you'll find that it's *easier* to make Linux run smoothly.
So, while I'm downloading centos for a spin, how about some
comments to
help me find a less bleeding edge linux distro...
If you want to be able to set things up easily, you *want* the more
bleeding-edge distros, because much of the bleeding edge these days is
centered around end-user improvements.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <
http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <
http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 72 degrees Fahrenheit.