On Dec 8, 2013, at 7:20 PM, Chris Murphy <lists(a)colorremedies.com> wrote:
But also unfortunate timing, in that there haven't been
significantly better alternatives to FAT32 that address resilience, volume size, and file
size limitations.
Oops, other than NTFS.
I don't know what the licensing terms are for NTFS vs exFAT, maybe there's some
meaningful difference. But I wonder why so many media devices fall for paying for exFAT,
which has significantly less resilience than FAT32, when NTFS is a viable cross platform
option.
Chris Murphy