On 2013-04-29 08:23, Tethys wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Joe Wulf <joe_wulf(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
> It is configured to be a usable 16:9 aspect ratio. Very pleased to see
> that.
I can't imagine why! 16:9 is pretty much the worst of the common
monitor aspect ratios. It's a shame it's also the one that seems to be
becoming most widespread.
Tet
--
"Java is a DSL for taking large XML files and converting them to stack
traces" -- Bulat Shakirzyanov
It would depend on what you are using it for.
I find that it can be useful having multiple windows open side by side
for work. I have become more productive with a 16:9 display compared to
my 4:3 display.
My 5 cents worth.