On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 00:25:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64
>
> The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the
> most common use case.
Maybe you missed the original message where he tried the equivalent of
that with dnf. There's something funny with the package name. I'm
guessing that the version is part of the name for some reason.
Then whoever created that package needs to be told. ;-)