Actually branch is not missing, User error.
But, there appears to be something else whther it's a kernel interface
error as proposed in the bug or something else.
Tony
On May 9, 2013 7:13 AM, "Tony Su" <tonysu(a)su-networking.com> wrote:
Thx all.
After being being pointed to systemd-sysctrl.service, I was able to find
this bug which was opened/closed/re-discussed/unresolved but the bug was
left "closed" which likely means it got lost
Http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850427
I'll re-open in my distro's bugzilla.
The curious thing is that this recent bug clearly says the IPv4 branch I
asked about earlier should exist, but I don't see it on my openSUSE system
(but this should be identical to Fedora). If the branch really is gone and
replaced, this is an important change systemd has made which lacks
documentation.
Maybe systemd(like SysVinit) ordinarily doesn't read the /proc/ tree again
after booting, but the User has always been able to modify and manually
invoke sysctl -p to update the system on the fly.
Tony
On May 8, 2013 1:55 PM, "poma" <pomidorabelisima(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08.05.2013 18:44, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
> …
> > systemd's involvement with /proc begins and ends with mounting it.
> > The kernel defines its contents and they will be the same regardless
> > of which init system you use.
> …
>
> cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-sysctl.service :)
>
>
> poma
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away:
http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>